HOME | EMAIL US | Production | Projects | Facts

Small Grain Research Menu

Results of Funded Research

 

Making No-till Wheat Production Profitable: Corn Hybrid Selection

Larry Grabau
Morris Bitzer
University of Kentucky


Objectives:

Objective 1#: Using an extra replication of UK corn hybrid performance trails in both Calloway and Fayette Counties, we will assess grain and biomass yields for 48 hybrids selected from the 129 hybrids being tested in 1997. Those 48 hybrids will be selected on the basis of widespread use by growers, differences in hybrid maturity and stalk strength. The idea is that a corn hybrid with a high harvest index could still produce a high yield but leave behind less residue to contend with at the time of wheat planting. We will also take a careful look at corn yields from the other replication at the 2 locations. The goal of this part of the research is to identify corn hybrids which could potentially fit in well with no-till wheat production systems.

Objective 2#: Using 12 hybrids selected from the 48 studied above, we plan to plant corn plots in 1998 and 1999 at WKU's research farm (pending approval) to support no-till wheat tests for production in 1998-99 and 1999-2000. The goal of this phase of the research project would be to determine how much, if any, improvement in established stands and grain yields of no-till wheat could be attributed to appropriate corn hybrid selection.


TOP

Project Overview:

Justification for Research

Corn residue helps reduce topsoil erosion in no-till wheat systems. However, that same corn residue can also greatly complicate stand establishments for no-till wheat, and may also reduce N availability and increase problems with winter survival. It is well known that corn hybrids differ in their yield potential; Kentucky farmers have naturally chosen to grow corn hybrids with the best possible yield potential. What is not know, however, is whether those high yielding corn hybrids all leave behind similar amounts of residue. In fact, a corn hybrid which produced slightly less yield but left behind substantially less residue might be a good pick for a no-till wheat production system. Therefore, it would be beneficial to Kentucky farmers considering no-till wheat systems to have information on how the available hybrids differ in residue amounts, as well as in their grain yield.

This study is designed in two phanses. The first phase makes use of existing plots growing during the 1997 corn season to identify a set of corn hybrids which might work well in no-till wheat systems. The second phase, covering the two subsequent corn and wheat production seasons, puts a dozen corn hybrids to the test regarding their fit with a no-till wheat production system. Completion of this research will help Kentucky grain producers make a careful economic evaluation of corn hybrid selection for no-till wheat.

Phase 1: Corn Hybrid Screening (conducted in fall of 1997)

Chuck Poneleit has indicated that a full extra replication of all 132 hybrids in the 1997 UK Hybrid Performance Trials in both Calloway and Fayette Counties is available for us to use. We would select a total of 48 hybrids to evaluate for biomass, yield, and harvest index in this preliminary test. Hybrids would be selected from each of the early, mid and late maturing groups. Further, we will also be sure to select several widely grown hybrids from each maturity class. In addition, we will evaluate past performance information to attempt to identify hybrids which may have higher harvest indices. Greater lodging scores and/or reduced stalk strengths might serve as indicators of lower stalk strength.

The same 48 hybrids would be evaluated in both locations. Plants would be cut from a 2 meter section of one row, then returned to Lexington to be dried and weighed for biomass yield. Ears would then be separated and run through a stationary combine to get grain yield. Finally, harvest index would be calculated as grain yield divided by biomass yield. For statistical purposes, each location would be considered as a replication. Yield performance and lodging scores from the remaining replications of the two tests will also be considered as part of the total data set.

Phase 2: Corn Hybrid Testing in No-Till Wheat Production Systems

From the 48 hybrids tested in the above screening trial, 12 would be selected for further, more intensively study. Four hybrids would be chosen from each of the three maturity classes (early, mid and late). Two of the four hybrids from each maturity class would be low in harvest index, and the other two would be high in harvest index. We would make sure that at least one widely grown hybrid was among the 4 tested from each maturity class.

The 12 corn hybrids would be planted on the research farm of Western Kentucky University (pending approval) in both the 1998 and 1999 corn production seasons. Four replications would be used. The corn plots would consist of four 30" wide rows, each 25 feet long. Each corn maturity class would be harvested as it matured, then flail chopped as soon as possible. The four hybrids from a given class will be planted in a single strip, in order to facilitate harvesting and chopping.

Two wheat varieties will be chosen. Both will be varieties thought to be well-adapted to no-till conditions, and an attempt will be made to secure seed-lots of similar seed size. We will plan to use a 10-foot no-till drill with one-half the drill containing the first variety and the other half containing the other variety. All wheat plots will be planted on the same day, hopefully around October 7 to 10 each season. Planting rates will be 35 viable seeds/sq. ft., and treated seed will of course be used.

Stand establishment and corn residue cover will be evaluated about two weeks after planting. We plan to use the camera and tripod system purchased for last year's on-farm grant to make slides of each corn plot, then evaluate residue cover by projecting the slides onto a 10 by 10 block grid. In the spring, tillering will be recorded, and headsd per unit area will also be counted. At harvest time, the plots will be harvested using a small 4 foot header combine. Besides grain yield and moisture, we will also evaluate test weight and kernel size.


TOP

Progress Report

Table 1 shows the results of our measurements of harvest index of 48 corn hybrids from both Fayette and Calloway Counties in the fall of 1997. From this information, we selected 12 hybrids to plant in the spring of 1998 on the farm of Tim Hughes in Simpson County. Those hybrids are shown on the attached map. This fall, we will harvest the corn at maturity, then plant two different wheat hybrids into each corn plot. We hope to learn if corn hybrid selection plays a significant rols in the success of no-till wheat.

TABLE 1. Harvest Index, Yield, and Calculated Corn Residue Level of
Selected Corn Hybrids in Kentucky, 1997.

Brand/Hybrid
by maturity, grain color

Fayette County

Calloway County

2 Co. Ave.

Seven County Average

Havest Index (%)

Yield
(bu/A)

Harvest Index (%)

Yield
(bu/A)

Harvest Index (%)

Residue (lb/A)

Yield
(bu/A)

Moisture (%)

Early Yellow Hybrids

Pioneer 3335

54.2a

164.1*

46.3

148.8*

50.3

9359b

166.3*

18.7*

Pioneer 33A14BT

52.2

167.5

50.2

152.7

51.2

8724

163.2

18.4

Becks 6205

53.8

179.1

51.0

120.4

52.4

7970

156.6

18.6

Pioneer 3394

54.1

155.7

49.2

138.6

51.7

8087

153.8

17.9

Dekalb DK626

64.4

147.9

45.9

153.4

55.1

7298

150.4

18.2

Bo-Jac 415

55.6

166.2

55.9

143.5

55.7

6610

148.5

18.1

Crow's 496

56.6

134.4

52.4

137.5

54.5

6848

146.0

18.4

Akin A6460

55.4

179.9

47.5

134.4

51.5

7627

142.8

18.3

Colbert Farms 220

51.8

144.8

48.1

126.2

50.0

7996

142.2

17.8

So. States SS676

51.7

125.3

49.3

137.5

50.5

7774

141.4

18.3

Medium Yellow Hybrids

Pfister 3977

56.8

156.0

52.2

132.1

54.5

7480

159.3

21.3

Exsegen ES617

55.3

179.7

50.5

117.6

52.9

7910

158.0

21.6

Pioneer 32K61

47.9

163.1

54.6

153.8

51.2

8382

155.9

20.1

Cargill 7770

53.1

163.5

49.8

152.0

51.5

8181

154.5

20.0

NK Brand N7639BT

51.6

193.0

47.1

141.7

49.3

8900

154.2

19.8

Great Lakes 6631

54.9

167.2

50.3

146.0

52.6

4691

151.9

21.6

Bo-Jac 614

50.8

163.1

45.8

127.4

48.3

9095

150.8

20.8

Dekalb DK683

40.0

168.0

49.2

145.8

44.6

10667

150.5

22.3

Mycogen 2815

55.0

168.6

53.0

126.9

54.0

7095

148.8

19.9

Glick Seed GH727

55.8

150.3

54.1

150.5

55.0

6829

148.7

19.1

Pioneer 3245

58.4

136.1

37.3

129.7

47.9

9947

148.7

20.5

Zimmerman Z41

56.5

151.1

51.3

120.5

53.9

7062

146.6

19.8

Dekalb DK642

56.7

140.0

49.1

139.1

52.9

7385

146.4

19.0

Golden Harvest H-2588

53.8

156.9

49.3

108.3

51.6

7665

145.2

19.5

L.G. Seeds LG2705

47.9

159.8

49.1

146.3

48.5

145.2

145.2

22.5

Dekalb DK706

49.7

143.0

47.6

138.9

48.6

8588

145.1

21.9

NK Brand N73-Q3

53.0

158.1

50.8

145.9

51.9

7531

144.9

20.0

Asgrow RX813

57.2

151.4

52.0

116.4

54.6

6776

144.8

20.0

Becks 8280

52.4

150.9

49.8

122.5

51.1

7765

144.7

21.8

Garst 8315

53.3

133.9

43.2

102.2

48.2

8804

143.4

21.7

Cargill 6888

55.4

154.4

54.4

149.9

54.9

6588

143.4

19.1

Caverndale FM. CF840

54.9

158.5

53.1

131.8

54.0

6816

142.8

21.1

Vineyard VX4596

51.5

164.2

49.4

143.0

50.5

7791

141.7

23.0

Agratech ATX787

54.5

152.5

48.7

116.8

51.6

7373

139.5

22.0

Asgrow RX771

55.7

160.1

54.2

110.2

54.9

6354

138.2

19.5

Callahan C7761

53.1

159.1

51.3

123.7

52.2

7034

137.1

18.8

Terra Seed TR1167

49.2

163.2

45.7

130.9

47.4

8538

137.1

22.3

Colbert Farms 324

54.2

171.8

51.7

105.7

53.0

6823

137.0

22.2

NK Brand N4575

45.5

144.6

48.6

135.5

47.0

8503

134.5

20.9

Great Lakes 6317

57.9

151.1

52.0

134.3

54.9

6081

131.6

19.4

So. States SS767

56.3

146.1

54.6

113.2

55.4

5886

130.6

19.5

Late Yellow Hybrids

So. States SS943

49.8

141.1

47.7

167.2

48.7

9528

161.5

23.4

Garst 8220

51.7

149.6

49.3

128.1

50.5

8711

158.5

23.3

Crow's 702

52.1

152.8

48.3

94.5

50.2

8456

151.8

24.1

Zimmerman Z29

45.5

180.3

51.4

125.2

48.5

8881

148.1

23.1

Caverndale FM. CF9753

45.9

147.7

49.5

140.1

47.7

8833

143.3

23.9

White Hybrids

Pioneer 3203W

53.3

151.8

40.6

136.8

47.0

9771

149.3

23.2

Zimmerman Z62W

49.3

156.3

38.6

107.9

44.0

10517

143.5

21.5

LSD (0.10)

------

26.3

------

34.4

NS

NS

10.0

0.8

*Column of data taken from 1997 Kentucky Hybrid Performance Test, Progress Report 397.
aCalculated by dividing weight of corn grain by the weight of the whole corn plant (including grain and stover).
bCalculated using the harvest index average of the 2 counties and the yield average of the 7 counties.

Corn Harvest Index Study 1998

401
12

402
10

403
7

404
6

405
9

406
8

407
11

408
7

409
1

410
3

411
5

412
2

301
4

302
3

303
7

304
5

305
2

306
12

307
8

308
11

309
7

310
10

311
9

312
6

201
7

202
11

203
6

204
9

205
8

206
10

207
12

208
2

209
5

210
1

211
4

212
3

101
1

102
2

103
3

104
4

105
5

106
6

107
7

108
8

109
9

110
10

111
11

112
12

Early Yellow Hybrids
1 Akin A6460
2 Crow's 496
3 Dekalb DK626
4 Pioneer 3394
5 So. States SS676

Medium Yellow Hybrids
 6 Cargill 6888
 7 Caverndale FM. CF840
 8 Dekalb DK642
 9 Great Lakes 6631
10 Mycogen 2815
11 NK Brand N73-Q3

Late Yellow Hybrid
12 So. States SS943

TOP

 

Kentucky Small Grain Growers Association
Copyright © All Rights Reserved.

www.kysmallgrains.org
Questions or comments?