HOME | EMAIL US | Production | Projects | Facts

Small Grain Research Menu

Results of Funded Research

 

Screening Soft Red Winter Wheat Varieties and Breeding Lines for Head Scab Resistance

Dave VanSanford
University of Kentucky

Objectives
Project Overview
Final Report and Data
(April 1998)
Final Report and Data (April 1999)


Objectives:

To identify varieties or breeding lines that show resistance to Fusarium graminearum, the causal agent of head scab. Specific objectives include:

  • to evaluate resistance among adapted wheats to initial infection by Fusarium

  • to evaluate resistance among adapted wheats to the spread of infection throughout the head

  • to evaluate these components of resistance in Chinese wheats from Shandong province, PRC

  • to continue to evaluate inoculation methods and evaluation methods


TOP

Project Overview:

Justification for Research

In 1991, Fusarium head blight, or head scab, caused losses approaching $50 million in the SRW wheat crop in Kentucky and much of the eastern wheat region. Since that year, we have not had an epidemic in Kentucky, although in 1995 we observed serious scab problems in several Kentucky counties, and in 1996, the problem was widespread throughout the state. In central Kentucky in 1997, head scab was a serious problem.

Conservation tillage has been cited as a major reason for the increased incidence of head scab in the HRS and SRW wheat crops. Given that the goal of the KySGGA is 75% no-till wheat by 2005, it is reasonable to assume that head scab will continue to be a major problem in Kentucky.

Head scab can greatly reduce wheat profitability through yield and test weight losses. Additional losses in food and feed quality occur through the production of mycotoxins which can cause livestock toxicosis or feed refusal. Grain with mycotoxins may be severely downgraded or rejected entirely in commerce.

Resistance to Scab

As an indication of how serious this problem is, virtually all of the breeding programs from Kentucky north are working on head scab resistance. There appear to be two components of resistance: 1) initial resistance to infection and 2) resistance to the spread of the fungus through the wheat head (Bai and Shaner, 1994, Plant Disease 78:760). Initial resistance to infection is thought to be controlled by many genes (difficult to breed for, like yield), while resistance to spread of infection may be under the control of a few genes (easier to select for). Chinese wheats such as Sumai 3 and Ning 7840 are widely regarded as the most resistant wheats, possessing both components of resistance. Last winter in the greenhouse, we crossed adapted wheats to F1's of VA wheats x Sumai 3 and Ning 7840. We also crossed adapted wheats to 3 recently released Purdue germplasms. F2 populations from these crosses will go to the field in the fall of 1998. As with all breeding procedures, transferring this resistance into our program will be very time consuming and require a great deal of effort.

1996-97 Studies

This past year we evaluated 22 adapted wheats for (1) resistance to initial infection and (2) resistance to spread through the head. Twenty eight Chinese wheats were also screened in study (1). In study (1), we inoculated corn kernels and spread them throughout wheat plots about 2 weeks prior to heading. The plots were mist irrigated just prior to flowering until about 1 week after flowering. This method worked very well in providing a heavy inoculum load. Pioneer Brand 2555 was used as a susceptible check planted around the plots, and it was virtually destroyed by head scab. In general, it appears that there will be significant varietal differences in response to inoculation with Fusarium. In our studies, Foster, 2510, Jackson and Coker 9803 showed some resistance or tolerance. Ernie and 2552 had a lower number of scabby florets/head, but a higher number of scabby heads.

In study 2, we inoculated single florets on 5 heads per plot with a Fusarium spore suspension, then monitored spread of the infection through the head. Again, it appears that varietal differences exist.

1997-98 Studies

We think that it is important to conduct these studies for another year to see if our results are repeatable, and to test the effect of another set of environmental conditions. We would also like to test other inoculation methods and additional genotypes.

Plan of Work

1. Approximately 30 wheat varieties and breeding lines will be planted in six row mini-plots (4' X 4') at Lexington, where the preceding crop will be corn. At about the boot stage, infected corn kernels will be spread throughout the plots and overhead irrigation will be provided during the day, through flowering. Disease incidence and severity will be assessed several times during grain fill. We will plant the same genotypes as a control in an area that will not be misted.

2. The same varieties and breeding lines will be assessed for resistance to fungal spread through the wheat and head by injecting inoculum into the central spikelets of several heads of each variety. This experiment will also be done in the field at Lexington. Disease spread will be evaluated during grain fill. We will also evaluate a method in which millet seeds are inoculated with Fusarium, then individual millet seeds will be placed in wheat florets, and disease spread will be measured. The advantage of this method is that you don't accidentally contaminate florets below the target floret when the inoculum overflows and runs down the head.

3. Thirty winter wheats from Shandong Agricultural University will be screened for resistance as described in 1 and 2. Other Chinese wheats may be obtained as well.

4. After comparing notes with other scientists this coming winter, we may evaluate other screening procedures.


TOP

Final Report
1998

In 1997 two studies involving 22 adapted varieties and breeding lines and 30 Chinese wheats were successfully inoculated with the fungus that causes head scab, Fusarium graminearum.

Study 1

The objective of the study was to test for "Type I" resistance, i.e., resistance to initial infection. The inoculum was increased on corn kernels, then about 3 weeks prior to flowering, the infected corn was placed in the plots between the rows. Mist irrigation during flowering resulted in a very intense scab epidemic. The spreader variety, Pioneer Brand 2555 was destroyed. In short, I think we created an unrealistically heavy scab epidemic, due to our unfamiliarity with the organism, procedures, and so on.

Study 2

The objective of this study was to screen for "Type II" resistance, which is resistance to spread througout the head. This was done by injecting individual florets with Fusarium spore suspension at flowering, and then observin whether the fungus moved to other florets from the initial site of infection. The control treatment for this study was injection with distilled water.

The experiment was compromised somewhat by the background levels of scab that were observed. On the data below, the average number of scabby seeds per 10 head sample was 63 in the control treatment, vs. 116 in the injection treatment. Nonetheless, there appear to be some varietal differences: e.g. 2510 with 16% infected seeds, vs. 2568 with 54% infected seeds.

We are augmenting both of these studies with greenhouse screening this year.

1997 Scab Injection Experiment

 

Injection Treatment

Control Treatment

Variety

Normal Seeds

Scabby Seeds

Normal Seeds

Scabby Seeds

Becker

210

100

347

84

Caldwell

245

125

326

26

Clark

152

70

278

55

Clemens

240

106

372

23

Coker 9663

150

105

154

85

Coker 9803

109

110

328

55

Elkhart

73

130

204

81

Ernie

133

115

140

33

FFR 555

171

148

252

105

Foster

208

100

321

65

Jackson

236

135

421

55

KY 86C-61-8

329

98

506

42

Madison

200

127

371

72

2510

380

75

410

65

2540

185

110

357

35

2552

232

75

327

49

2568

155

185

370

111

2684

37

56

133

25

Patterson

121

165

459

65

Pocahontas

215

170

460

90

Verne

151

132

290

110

         
SUM

3932

2437

6826

1331

AVERAGE

187.24

116.05

325.05

63.38

 

1997 Scab Irrigation Experiment

Variety Incidence Severity Index Grain Yield (bu/a)
Coker9803

60.33

31.67

19.11

23.58

Foster

63.00

25.33

15.96

24.60

Coker9633

73.00

43.33

31.63

20.14

Cardinal

73.33

27.33

20.04

17.64

Patterson

74.00

43.00

31.82

16.62

Pio2510

76.67

34.00

26.07

21.90

Pio2552

77.67

49.00

38.06

17.02

Madison

78.33

45.00

35.25

21.15

Caldwell

78.67

38.67

30.42

17.36

Clemens

78.67

38.33

30.16

20.11

Jackson

79.33

37.00

29.35

17.71

Elkhart

80.00

65.67

52.53

16.63

KY86c-61-8

81.33

36.00

29.28

17.13

Pio2540

81.33

51.67

42.02

19.36

Pio2684

83.33

62.00

51.67

12.45

Verne

84.33

55.33

46.66

17.58

Clark

85.33

27.67

41.24

22.78

Pio2568

85.33

48.33

23.61

19.30

Pocahontas

85.67

50.00

42.83

15.06

Becker

86.33

48.67

42.02

14.27

Ernie

86.67

55.33

47.96

13.07

FFR555

87.00

54.00

46.98

13.99

         
MEAN

79.00

35.20

35.20

18.10

CV %

13.60

22.10

22.10

20.70

LSD (0.05)

17.60

12.70

12.70

6.10

TOP


Final Report
1999

 In 1998 we screened a number of entries in the Uniform Eastern Scab Nursery to Fusarium head blight by inoculating field plots with the fungus Fusarium graminearum.

The best summary of this research that I can provide is the data presented at the 1998 Fusarium head blight Conference in E. Lansing, Michigan.

Tables 1 and 2 show that there is some variation among our adapted SRW wheats in resistance or tolerance to scab. We don't see anything outstanding, but we see some promising differences.

Table 3 shows the level of scab acieved in our incoulated plots, versus the background level visible in uninoulated control plots: 26 versus 16 % scabby seed. This suggests that the scab level in the inoculated plots is higher than is likely to occur with a natural infection. This means that we impose severe selection pressure, but it also means that we may discard lines that acutally show some promise under "normal" scab levels.

Future reports on this activity will be contained within the breeding project reports.

Table 1. Results of the 1998 Winter Uniform Scab Nursery at Lexington, KY.

Entry Incidence (% heads) Severity
(% florets)
Index Scabby Seed (%) Yield (Bu/A) Test Wt. (lb/Bu)
Patterson (S check) 72.6 90 65.34 25.14 38.1 44.8
Freedom (R check) 5834 30 17.52 32.84 40.0 44.7
P2545 (S check) 68 60 40.8 50.54 36.1 42.5
Ernie (R check) 69.5 70 48.65 34.25 34.2 46.3
M94-1048 63.4 50 31.7 26.1 42.5 49.1
OH618 31.2 10 3.12 14.55 43.7 49.0
OH552 52.7 15 7.905 18.79 48.0 50.3
OH536 67.6 12 8.112 30.4 36.0 46.9
OH544 49.9 15 7.485 19.08 34.4 47.6
Wakefield 72.6 50 36.3 21.29 30.4 45.6
VA96-54-216 77.6 90 69.84 45.72 26.2 46.2
VA93-54-429 73.1 45 32.895 19.05 30.4 51.3
VA96-54-234 77.5 50 38.75 42.64 34.5 45.9
IL94-1909 55.2 15 8.28 19.73 46.1 51.2
IL94-1549 52.9 12 6.348 36 27.3 48.9
92823A1-1-4-4-5 45.3 45 20.385 17.8 39.2 47.2
92807A1-1-5-1-1 84.4 * * 24.4 40.9 46.7
89118RC1-X-9-3-3 59.8 12 7.176 12.92 37.3 51.7
86958RC4-2-1-10 72.4 75 54.3 30.04 35.7 47.0
88288C1-6-2-8 70.9 35 24.815 25.85 33.1 47.1
92829A1-1-1-3-3 30.1 30 9.03 8.74 36.5 48.1
KS85W663-11-6-42 45.1 15 6.765 13.9 31.6 50.9
Geneva 65.3 57 37.221 34.05 21.7 43.2
Cayuga 56.6 17 9.622 20.09 19.7 45.5
NY85019-7117 56.1 35 19.635 36.73 27.7 43.4
NY87048W-7387 37.9 30 11.37 17.17 18.2 46.9
NY87047W-7405 79.9 90 71.91 27.63 24.9 42.9
NY64/H//H-7133 48.9 35 17.115 24.46 32.9 44.3
Agripro Foster 61.3 57 34.941 22.96 22.4 45.6
D5330 53.7 12 6.444 18.73 26.7 43.8
D4045 36.3 56 20.328 40.96 31.0 42.9
DC005 44 15 6.6 21.14 29.7 46.6
Ramrod 52.1 50 26.05 22.21 36.0 43.1
MEAN 58.9 40.0 24.4 25.9 33.12 46.6
CV (%) 28.5 30.4 45.1 12.6 19.0 3.9
LSD (0.05) 29.4 20.6 19.7 30 9.8 3.6

Table 2. Evaluation of SRW Wheat Breeding Lines for Scab Resistance, Lexington, KY, 1998.

Entry Incidence (% heads) Severity (% florets) Index Scabby Seed (%) Yield (bu/A) Test Wt. (lb/Bu)
KY89C-895-14 36.41 23 8.37 20.1 29.3 47.9
KY89C-225-6 49.90 30 14.97 9.1 32.5 48.6
KY89C-888-29 51.60 30 15.48 40.6 25.4 43.8
KY89C-888-32 53.44 23 12.29 36.0 34.4 45.8
KY89C-744-19 54.06 23 12.43 42.9 37.2 46.2
KY89C-744-44 57.93 20 11.59 28.1 32.4 45.8
KY89C-225-11 58.61 40 23.44 27.3 31.1 45.8
KY89C-753-48 60.24 40 24.09 62.2 28.7 43.8
KY89C-744-57 61.34 33 20.24 46.8 33.8 45.0
KY89C-804-37 62.10 36 22.36 37.5 32.6 46.1
KY89C-007-3 62.87 30 18.86 24.6 37.2 48.0
KY89C-888-14 66.84 40 26.74 51.0 22.8 44.1
KY89C-225-5 67.28 30 20.18 44.1 37.4 45.8
KY89C-804-14 67.33 43 28.95 56.4 25.8 44.1
KY89C-752-21 71.86 26 18.68 57.1 31.6 43.2
KY89C-804-18 72.96 46 33.56 32.1 21.7 43.3
KY89C-873-43 72.87 30 21.89 42.9 23.5 49.1
KY89C-720-10 73.12 46 33.63 53.3 26.4 42.3
KY89C-744-40 75.14 30 22.54 49.7 35.8 45.6
KY89C-804-23 75.65 40 30.26 61.7 28.1 43.1
KY89C-804-55 75.86 50 37.93 56.4 33.1 37.0
KY89C-804-11 84.48 33 27.88 47.4 26.9 46.6
 
Mean 64.56 33.57 22.10 41.90 29.89 45.18
CV % 26.2 28.6 39.1 26.8 19.9 3.4
LSD (0.05) 27.32 25.8 23.7 17.0 9.4 3.1

Table 3. Uniform Winter Scab Nursery Under Treated And Control Conditions, Lexington, KY, 1998.

Entry Treated± Control Difference
Scabby Kernels (%) Scabby Kernels (%) Scabby Kernels (%)
Patterson 25.1 10.1 15.0
Freedom 32.8 14.5 18.3
P2545 50.5 32.5 18.0
Ernie 34.2 19.2 15.0
M94-1048 26.1 4.0 22.1
OH618 14.5 18.1 -3.5
OH552 18.8 9.9 8.9
OH536 30.4 12.6 17.8
OH544 19.1 28.1 -9.0
Wakefield 21.3 11.8 9.5
VA96-54-216 45.7 9.9 35.8
Roane 19.0 18.8 0.2
VA96-54-234 42.6 24.3 18.3
IL94-1909 19.7 3.9 15.8
IL94-1549 36.0 4.8 31.2
92823A1-1-4-4-5 17.8 20.8 -3.0
92807A1-1-5-1-1 24.4 21.5 2.9
89118RC1-X-9-3-3 12.9 6.4 6.5
86958RC4-2-1-10 30.0 14.3 15.7
88288C1-6-2-8 25.8 29.2 -3.3
92829A1-1-1-3-3 8.74 6.6 2.1
KS85W663-11-6-42 13.9 7.2 6.7
Geneva 34.0 18.5 15.5
Cayuga 20.0 46.7 -26.6
NY85019-7117 36.7 12.2 24.5
NY87048W-7387 17.2 1.37 15.8
NY87047W-7405 27.6 10.0 17.6
NY64/H//H-7133 24.4 19.5 4.9
Argripro Foster 22.9 5.5 17.4
D5330 18.7 4.8 13.9
D4045 40.9 21.5 19.4
DC005 21.1 27.9 -6.7
Ramrod 22.2 22.4 -.02
 
MEAN 25.9 15.7 10.2

±Inoculated with scabby corn and mist irrigated.

References

Mesterhazy, A. 1995. Types and components of resistance to Fusarium head blight of wheat. Plant Breeding 114: 377-386.

Paulitz, T.C. 1996. Diurnal release of ascospores by Gibberella zeae in inoculated wheat plots. Plant Dis. 80: 674-678.

TOP

Kentucky Small Grain Growers Association
Copyright © All Rights Reserved.

www.kysmallgrains.org
Questions or comments?